ITAA's Year 2000 Outlook February 5, 1999 Volume 4, No. 5 Published by the Information Technology Association of America, Arlington, VA Bob Cohen, Editor bcohen@itaa.org Read in over 80 countries around the world ITAA's Year 2000 Outlook is published every Friday to help all organizations deal more effectively with the Year 2000 software conversion. To create a subscription to this free publication, please visit ITAA on the web at https://www.itaa.org/transact/2ko utlooksub.htm. To cancel an existing subscription, visit https://www.itaa.org/transact/2kremove.htm. ITAA's Year 2000 Outlook is sponsored in part by CACI International Inc., DMR Consulting Group Inc., and Y2Kplus. Food for Thought on Capitol Hill Lawmakers concerned that no news may be perceived as bad news held a hearing today on the status of the nation's food industry and encouraged food growers to produce more information on the Year 2000. "Y2K is an insidious digital pestilence that may threaten aspects of our robust food production system," said Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), Vice Chairman of the Special Senate Committee on the Year 2000 Technology Problem. Dodd said the food industry has been largely silent on the issue, contributing inadvertently to public fears. Calling information technology almost as import to the food supply chain as photosynthesis, Dodd said the Y2K bug could "needlessly gnaw away at corporate competitiveness and consum er confidence." Committee Chairman Bob Bennett (R-UT) said his is committee staff "is flooded with calls asking, 'will there be food on the shelves?'" Bennett said the food industry must answer the question and provide realistic readiness assessment information. Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman did his best to reassure the Committee that Y2K won't tip the nation's food cart. Glickman said the government agencies charged with monitoring the situation for the federal Y2K Council do not believe the Year 2000 prob lem "will cause widespread, or severe, disruptions in the food supply." He predicted minor, localized effects. Bennett and Glickman appeared to disagree on the importance of computers to farm operations. Bennett cited a study showing that 80 percent of American farmers use computers as "integral" to their business, 33 percent use the Internet and 75 percent own c ellular phones. Glickman said only 32 percent of farmers use automated systems, mostly for record-keeping, while only 2.5 percent have automation in feeding, storage or milking systems, or use the global positioning system in the production process. Ove r half of farmers working to fix their systems have spent $1000 or less, Glickman said. The Agriculture Secretary said keeping bottled water, canned food, candles and batteries is just a good sense bad weather precaution but added that "needless and frivolous stockpiling of supplies can create isolated shortages." International Players Set up Y2K Mission Control The U.S. joined with the United Nations and World Bank leaders today to announce the creation of an International Y2K Cooperation Center. The Center has been established to facilitate greater information sharing among countries and to promote and support regional and sectoral efforts to address the Year 2000 problem. U.S. Y2K Council Chairman John Koskinen and National Year 2000 Coordinators from 10 other countries will serve on a steering committee to provide overall guidance for the Center's activities. Funding will come from in kind donations from various countries and the World Bank. Bruce McConnell, formerly Chief of Information Policy and Technology at the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, will serve as the Center's Director. The "virtual" center will function as a "communications hub" to connect Y2K informa tion officers worldwide to share practices, strategies, solutions and contingency plans, said McConnell. The Center idea grew out of a United Nations-organized meeting Dec. 11, where more than 120 countries shared their strategies, said Pakistani Ambassador Ahmad Kamal, chair of the UN Economic and Social Council's Informatics Working Group. "Concerns about the Year 2000 problem don't stop at any country's border," said Koskinen. Travel Reservation Systems a Go on Y2K Revelers looking to ring in the millennium in an exotic locale, or the more traditional New Year's spots like New York City and Las Vegas, can now book airline flights. Travel industry experts say the reservations for January 1, 2000 are going off withou t a hitch, a strong indication that Year 2000 remediation efforts have been successful. The computerized reservations systems used by major airlines and many car rental and other travel industry businesses display dates for sale only 331 days in advance. Thus, Thursday became the first day to book travel for next January 1. More than 100,000 travel agencies that book some 80 percent of all flights depend on systems operated by just a handful of computer reservation system (CRS) companies. No major difficulties were reported yesterday related to the possible inability of com puter systems to recognize the year 2000. "The CRS' have been saying all along that they would have their systems in compliance, and it appears they were right," American Society of Travel Agents President and CEO Joe Galloway said in a statement released today. Airlines seem to be taking the success in stride. Bookings began shortly after midnight Thursday morning, with none reporting major problems. Delta's computerized reservation systems are performing precisely as planned,'' said Charlie Feld, chief infor mation officer for the Atlanta-based carrier. Like Delta, United and other airlines saw Thursday as the real test. "We really felt we were ready,'' said spokeswoman Kristina Price, who estimated United has spent $70 million on its Year 2000 Project. "We think this was the first major milestone.'' "It was a success across the board. We have a Y2K department that has been working on this issue for over a year, and the entire program is going very well. We're working with the airports and all the vendors that the airlines work with," said Diana Cr onan, spokesperson for the Air Transport Association. "The way things are going right now, we have full confidence in the system," Cronan added. Booking airline tickets, of course, is not the same as actually taking off or landing at airports. Because the number of reservation systems is small, the focus of Y2K attention can be very focused and enjoy enormous economies of scale. Airports lack this advantage. As Gartner Group executive Jim Cassell points out, airports operate with many, complex information systems that the flying public never sees. These include everything from crew scheduling to baggage handling. So while Cass ell calls the airline industry's success "fantastic," he also notes that "if those reservation systems work, a lot of [different] airlines get off the ground," he said. "I never worried about the airlines per se." He seems much less sanguine about the o peration of airports themselves. Meanwhile, the travel industry expects the period around New Year's Eve and Jan. 1, 2000, to be busy, with people heading to celebrations and other gatherings. Cruises are the most popular destination choice, according to ASTA, and Galloway added that "B ecause of the increased demand, consumers should be aware that all of the major carriers have made all classes of seats, including first-class and full-coach, non-refundable and instant-purchase for travel between December 16, 1999 and January 10, 2000, f or some popular destinations." Ports Seek to Steer Clear of Y2K Problems With the Year 2000 deadline looming, the maritime industry has more than cargo on its manifest. Almost 95 percent of US export and import trade relies on maritime shipping. But with little data regarding domestic and international Y2K efforts in the maritime industry, the issue is whether this commerce will remain on course come January 1, 2000. Early next month, the maritime industry will respond to a Coast Guard request for comments (RFC) on what control measures may be necessary to minimize Y2K-related disturbances on shipboard and at port facilities. "To counter this potential problem, Coast Guard is considering using existing authority to implement more restrictive control measures to ensure port, vessel, facility and environmental safety," the RFC notes. Some of the questions the Coast Guard wants answered include whether or not it should consider suspending all port operations for some period of time. That may be nothing short of draconian, but as Rear Admiral G. N. Naccara points out, the Coast Guard is keeping tabs on 80,000 annual visits to U.S. ports by 7,700 vessels sailing under foreign flags. These ships can be very techno-dependent, operating with minimal crews. Naccara says the Coast Guard is trying to hail the attention of all shippers and port authorities involved by conducting a March meeting in London of 14 international maritime trade organizations. Shipboard systems are the focus of much Y2K attention, with automation standing watch over everything from propulsion, ballast and boilers to communications, radar and steering. Problems in navigating a shipping canal or harbor could be disastrous to peo ple, property and the environment. But the Year 2000 bug is also potentially lurking at portside in the systems and equipment that drive efficient maritime authority operations. While everything from ships to cargo containers looks big and somewhat awkward while resting in port, much that is nimble and precise is taking place just below the surface. Transported by large containerships, the timely and efficient delivery of goods d epends on technology designed to expedite processing of goods through ports, move international trade through customs, and to track the point of origin as well as the destination of containers and other cargo. With maritime profitability dictated by slim profit margins, a delay of even a few hours in a port can translate into substantial losses. As Jeff Leong, a spokesman for the Harbor Department of the City of Los Angeles states, "Time is critical to shippers. Any cargo sitting idle would be hurtful." Chris Mowrey, Director of Planning and Technology for the North Carolina State Ports Authority, says he thinks the Coast Guard is trying to get the industry's attention with its pointed list of questions. Mowrey chairs the information technology committe e of the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) and says his peers around the country have good awareness on the issue and are moving to get the "large chunks" under control. Those large chunks could include central servers providing core financial systems, cargo tracking, maintenance and repairs, and parts tracking. Other pieces could include electronic data interchange between ports and steamship lines or cargo interests, electronic links to the U.S. Customs Service or service providers, desktop applications, warehousing and facilities management, and the embedded systems components of cargo handling equipment, including cranes. Enter the Year 2000 problem and the job of moving 40-foot long containers, often weighing in excess of a ton. Typically, once a vessel arrives in port, the design of the tower crane at berth enables either a container to be lifted onto a train or directl y onto a truck chassis, and whisked off to the customer. Even though the process does not happen in the blink of an eye, at speeds of one container per minute, the job still requires precise movements coordinated and finessed by computers. And as with al l modern applications, these systems have embedded chips that, should they fail, could put a kink in crane operations. On modern cranes, programmable logic controllers control movements like hoisting, booming and gantry, utilize "permissives" to safety- check crane motion, and generate safety information. Other on board computers may be used to gather cargo data and generate reports for stevedores and other harbor personnel. The good news is that many US ports have a combination of the older diesel-electric cranes that unlike newer all-electric cranes are not susceptible to computer failure. High tech in these older models is pretty much limited to an on/off switch. However, these cranes are typically much slower and therefore not capable of unloading containers at the same pace as newer ones, therefore potentially delaying a vessel by several hours, depending on the number of containers. Also encouraging is that m any US ports have either already replaced or are in the process of replacing systems in cranes that are not Year 2000 compliant. As for the embedded systems of affected cargo handling equipment, built mostly in the 1980s, "About all you can do is be aware of what equipment you have, inventory brands, and poke around to see if anyone knows status information" says North Carolina's M owrey. "Dozens of trade organizations are looking at their equipment and providing lists of what is or isn't compatible over the Internet. But anyone who says they've tested these systems and can say for sure they are compliant…I would be hard pressed t o believe." At the same time, however, Mowrey seems confident that date deficient cranes will still get the job done. "Cranes will pick up cargo thinking its 1940 as well as it would in 1999," he says. Farther up the coast, the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) oversees the Maryland Port Administration (MPA) and the Port of Baltimore and reports that its Y2K efforts have been underway for the better part of four years, according to Alisoun Mo ore, the Chief Information Officer. Although Moore calls Year 2000 a "worry project," she says many of the Y2K "what-if scenarios" are past their prime. There's been so much attention across the country to the issue that scenarios which would have been i mportant two years ago have been eliminated by system fixes, she says. The MDOT official appears confident that her agency has flushed any Y2K ballast from its systems. Mowrey agrees that like any problem steaming into port, the Y2K issue needs to be kept in perspective. "Are we going to quit moving containers because the air conditioning in the Administration Building breaks? I doubt it." Business to Business Bellcore, Morristown, NJ, has unveiled a suite of Y2K services covering program and risk assessment, verification and testing, carrier management, and contingency planning. PLATINUM Technology, Oakbrook Terrace, IL, has introduced PLATINUM TransCentury Office 2.0, an updated version of their Y2K desktop solution. Logix Solutions, Inc., a division of ATEC Group, Inc., Hauppauge, NY, has won nine Y2K contracts with both government agencies and commercial organizations located in California, New York, Colorado and Hawaii. Alydaar Software Corporation, Charlotte, NC, has acquired Data Systems Network Corporation, a network integration company. C2i Solutions, San Diego, CA, has been awarded a contract by a major French insurance company to provide Y2K consulting services. ITAA Y2K Information Center Solution Providers Directory http://www.itaa.org/script/2000vend.cfm ITAA*2000 Certification Program http://www.itaa.org/2000cert.htm Outlook Archive http://www.itaa.org/script/get2klet.cfm Legislative and Litigation Table http://www.itaa.org/Y2Klaw.htm Calendar http://www.itaa.org/y2kcal.htm Vendor/User Status Questionnaires http://www.itaa.org/questmain1.htm Copyright ITAA 1999. All rights reserved. The Information Technology Association of America, 1616 N. Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1300, Arlington, VA 22209. Internet: http:\\www.itaa.org